Home

AquAlliance exists to defend northern California waters and to challenge threats to the hydrologic health of the northern Sacramento River watershed. We are prepared and willing to confront the escalating attempts to divert more and more water from the northern Sacramento River hydrologic region.

—————————————————————————————————————

  • Little fish could be savior for overtapped delta
  • San Joaquin Valley farmers reach secret deal in water dispute
  • Is LaMalfa Misinformed on Water Bill or Misleading the Public?
  • Draft EIS/EIR “seriously flawed” – Butte County Board of Supervisors
  • California officials delay massive Delta water tunnel project
  • Lawsuit Produces Desired Outcome
  • The Politics of Drought: California Water Interests Prime the Pump in Washington
  • California drought: Central Valley farmland on its last legs
—————————————————————————————————————

Costs vs. Benefits of Big Water Projects: When compared with urban water efficiency, the water storage projects that would be half-funded by the November water bond have very high per-project costs, low yield, and immensely high costs per acre-foot of water. Increasing urban water efficiency only costs about $112 per acre-foot while raising Shasta dam is over $23,000 per acre-foot and building Sites reservoir is almost $6,000 an acre-foot. (An acre-foot is 325,851 gallons of water, enough to last two average California households a year for outdoor and indoor uses.)

Sources for AquAlliance’s Bar Graph: Shasta: Bureau of Reclamation, Plan Formulation Appendices, 2013; Temperance Flat: DWR, Temperance Flat Reservoir FAQ, 2007; Sites: DWR, Sites Reservoir FAQ, 2007; Urban Water Efficiency: CalFed Bay Delta Program, Water Use Efficiency Element, 2006 (pp. 126, 130)