|
Surface water depletion from excessive ground water use has been observed over many decades in portions of California.
One recent example is the Cosumnes River, where “[d]eclining fall flows are limiting the ability of the Cosumnes River
to support large fall runs of Chinook salmon,” (Fleckenstein, et al. 2004) due to elevated agricultural and municipal
pumping. This is a river that historically supported a large fall run of Chinook salmon, yet in the last 40 years their numbers
have dropped from 5,000 to zero with an average of 600 in recent years. Id. (USFWS 1995). Indeed, “[f]all flows in the
Cosumnes have been so low in recent years that the entire lower river has frequently been completely dry throughout most of
the salmon migration period (October to December).” Id.
The massive ground water extractions that have decimated the Cosumnes River have not taken place in the northern
Sacramento River watershed, but they have begun through the Drought Water Bank , the Glenn Colusa experimental pumping project.
The programmatic planning for many more projects is already completed. The projects and plans ignore the northern Sacramento
Valley, foothills, and mountains that need water not only for their own cities, residential wells, recreation, businesses,
and family farms, but also for threatened and endangered species that require the indigenous aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
Fourteen significant rivers and creeks (the Sacramento River, Feather River, Battle Creek, Big Chico Creek, Butte Creek, Comanche
Creek, Deer Creek, Lindo Channel, Little Chico Creek, Mill Creek, Mud Creek, Rock Creek, Thomes Creek, Stony Creek) are part
of the system that provide crucial habitat for native plants and wildlife, including but not limited to Chinook salmon, steelhead,
the giant garter snake, countless avian species, and more. Massive proposed ground water extractions would not only drain
the aquifers but would also result in the loss of stream flow, riparian habitat, and oak woodlands (Bouwer 1997). Of special
significance is Butte Creek’s wild spring-run Chinook salmon, which is the largest run in the Sacramento River system.
Impaired surface water flows not only impact the quantity of water for fish and habitat, but also the quality of the water
from elevated temperature and the concentration of pollutants.
|
 |
Butte, Colusa, Glenn, and Tehama counties are the jurisdictions above the Tuscan Aquifer that are central to all the
state and federal plans to provide more water for users south of the Bay Delta. As demonstrated above, a fully charged ground
water basin keeps creeks flowing and riparian vegetation vibrant. Joseph L. Sax expanded on surface water/ground water dynamics
by noting that the interaction between ground water and surface water is geologically varied, complex, and unpredictable from
year to year, “[d]epending on a variety of factors, such as the varied transmissivity of the material in which it is
found, the varied obstacles it encounters, and the diverse gradients over which it travels in its movement through the earth.
In addition, at various points in time or space, groundwater may be in hydraulic connection with a surface stream, or it may
be confined, at least for some distance, beneath a quite impermeable layer.” (2002). Scientific understanding of the
interactions discussed by Sax are sorely missing in the northern Sacramento River hydrologic region (Hoover 2008). Lacking
sound scientific and comprehensive understanding of the region’s water dynamics, the agencies are still willing to throw
caution to the wind with massive water transfers that involve hundreds of thousands of acre feet of ground water.
In spite of the lack of a scientific foundation, one principle of hydrodynamics is quite clear: excessive depletion
of ground water in the northern Sacramento Valley, whether it is from water transfers or over use, will lower the water table
regionally and locally and dewater creeks, streams, and the Sacramento River just as excessive surface diversions and ground
water pumping did in the Owens Valley, the San Fernando Valley, the San Joaquin Valley, and the southern end of the Sacramento
Valley. Such a result would not only decimate the most significant watershed in California, but it would likely obliterate
what remains of the Bay Delta, the largest inland estuary in North America, and its resident and migratory species. AquAlliance
seeks to halt the repetition of history.

|
 |
 |
 |
Unquenchable Desert Thirst
Westlands, as it is commonly called, is the largest water district in the
United States. It is comprised of over 600,000 acres in Fresno and Kings counties and was formed in 1952. Despite the fact
that it has junior water rights under the law, it denies this and has used its amassed wealth to seduce politicians and procure as
much water as possible from federal and state agencies and senior water rights holders. SalmonWaterNow created an outstanding
video that sheds light on this nefarious player in California's water struggles.
Watch the video.
More on Westlands' history:
Read article: Central Valley irrigation district fights to save arid farmland, despite cost to taxpayers

2010-2011 Water Transfer
Program
The Bureau of
Reclamation is preparing to launch a 2-year water transfer program, which continues their longterm effort to "integrate" the
ground and surface water of the northern Sacramento River watershed into the state water supply.
Click a link to view:
- Bureau document
- AquAlliance comments on the 2010-2011 Water Transfer Program


|
| click image ro view report |
USGS Report: Groundwater Availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, California
As the demand for water increases in California the status of aquifers in California's great Central Valley is critical
information to residents on both sides of the Delta. This report provides some background on the current status of aquifers
in the central valley.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|